USPTO serial 73831352
TETRIS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SMITH, JEFFREY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TETRIS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JERALD E. NAGAE
JERALD E NAGAE CHRISTENSEN, O'CONNOR, ET AL2800 PACIFIC FIRST CTR1420 FIFTH AVESEATTLE, WA 98101Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT AND SOFTWARE, NAMELY, VIDEO GAME EQUIPMENT HAVING AN OUTPUT DISPLAY, HAND-HELD ELECTRONIC UNIT FOR PLAYING A GAME, ELECTRONIC TOYS HAVING A CLOCK FUNCTION, AND ELECTRONIC GAME PROGRAMS | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by COMPUTING CENTER OF THE ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE USSR
- Other trademarks owned by V/O ELEKTRONORGTECHNIKA
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Similar marks named TETRIS
- Prosecution event ABN2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 26, 1993 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 4, 1992 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 24, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 11, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 19, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 15, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 4, 1990 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Apr 20, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 11, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 23, 1990 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 22, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 4, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 29, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |