USPTO serial 73831378
EXPANDOMER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BORSUK, ESTHER
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with EXPANDOMER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LAWRENCE E. ABELMAN
LAWRENCE E ABELMAN ABELMAN FRAYNE REZAC & SCHWAB708 THIRD AVENEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | POLYMMER FORMULATIONS USED TO REDUCE SHRINKAGE USED IN THE CHEMICAL INDUSTRY | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 10, 1993 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Mar 3, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 22, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 16, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 27, 1993 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 24, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 29, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 3, 1992 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 20, 1991 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 15, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 16, 1991 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 23, 1991 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 26, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 8, 1990 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 14, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 3, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 28, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 4, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |