USPTO serial 73832601
MISTER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KUSER, BLAINE T.
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MISTER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
SARDIS, BRITISH COLUMBIA, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ADRIENNE L. WHITE, ESQ.
WASHINGTON & PRINCE STSTHE GEORGE MASON BLDGPOST OFFICE BOX 1404ALEXANDRIA, VA 22313-1404Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | HIGH PRESSURE COOLING/HUMIDIFYING/FOGGING SYSTEMS, ESSENTIALLY COMPRISING PUMPS, MOTORS, PULSATION DAMPENERS, PARAPLATES, SOLENSOIDS, ELECTRICAL BOXES, RELAYS, FLEX HOSES, PRESSURE GAUGES, BRASS FITTINGS, STAINLESS STEEL TUBING, STAINLESS STEEL CABLE, ISOLATION VALVES, AUTOMATIC DRAIN VALVES, ATOMIZING NOZZLES, WATER FILTER HOUSINGS, WATER FILTERS, STAINLESS STEEL CABINETS AND BASES, PRESSURE REGULATORS, SWITCHES AND STARTERS, ALL SOLD AS A UNIT FOR THE AGRICULTURAL INDUSTRY, POULTRY RANCHES, HOG AND CATTLE FARMS, COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL BUILDINGS, RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES AND SPORTS FACILITIE | ABANDONED | Jan 4, 1987 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 30, 1991 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 25, 1991 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 25, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 1, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 2, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 15, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 5, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 20, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 11, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |