USPTO serial 73833631
LAI SUN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- NELSON, EDWARD
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LAI SUN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
RICHARD S KOPPEL
RICHARD S KOPPEL KOPPEL & JACOBS555 ST CHARLES DR STE 107THOUSAND OAKS, CA 91360UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 21, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 11, 1999 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 28, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 24, 1998 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 15, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 15, 1997 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 21, 1996 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 11, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 19, 1996 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 13, 1995 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 1, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 16, 1994 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 4, 1994 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 11, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 20, 1993 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 31, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 1, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 9, 1992 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 13, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 27, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 2, 1991 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 29, 1991 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Sep 13, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 26, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 17, 1990 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 9, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 15, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |