USPTO serial 73834231
SPORT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SZOKE, MICHAEL
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SPORT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
MONTREAL, QUEBEC, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
A. YATES DOWELL, JR.
A YATES DOWELL JR DOWELL & DOWELLSTE 705 2001 JEFFERSON DAVIS HWYARLINGTON, VA 22202UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | SOAPS, HAND AND BODY LOTIONS, CREAMS, BATH OIL, SUN TAN LOTIONS AND SKIN CARE PRODUCTS, DEODORANT, ANTIPERSPIRANT, TALC, COLOGNE AND FRAGRANCES, SHAMPOO, CONDITIONER, STYLING GEL AND OTHER HAIR CARE PRODUCTS, SHAVE CREAM, SHAVE GEL, AFTER SHAVE, SHAVE LOTION AND OTHER SHAVING PRODUCTS | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 22, 1993 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 5, 1992 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 20, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 28, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 13, 1991 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 6, 1991 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 5, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 7, 1990 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 21, 1989 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 12, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |