USPTO serial 73834343
DOME
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 16, 1997
- Examiner
- PRICE, JERRY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with DOME?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
ETOBICOKE, ONTARIO, CA
ETOBICOKE, ONTARIO, CA
ETOBICOKE, ONTARIO, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
KENNETH M. GARRETT
KENNETH M GARRETT1033 BAY STSTE 308TORONTO, ON M5S 3A5Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | FRESH YOGURT | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ASTRO DAIRY PRODUCTS LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by ASTRO DAIRY PRODUCTS LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by ASTRO DAIRY PRODUCTS LIMITED
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Similar marks named DOME
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 19, 2004 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Sep 16, 1997 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 24, 1997 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 23, 1997 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 21, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 25, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 23, 1996 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 23, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 4, 1996 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 21, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 12, 1995 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 10, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 28, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 3, 1994 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 15, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 24, 1994 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 28, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 21, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 6, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 9, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 9, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 12, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 28, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 18, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 18, 1991 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 18, 1990 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 18, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 18, 1990 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 7, 1990 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 16, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |