USPTO serial 73834477
RESTORATION PLUS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BLUE, RACHEL
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with RESTORATION PLUS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
LONDON, ONTARIO, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MARVIN C. SOFFEN
MARVIN C SOFFEN OSTROLENK, FABER, GERB & SOFFEN1180 AVE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10036-8403UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | PHARMACEUTICAL PREPARATIONS, NAMELY--LACTOBACILLI AND THE ANTIMICROBIAL COMPONENTS THEREOF FOR THE TREATMENT AND PREVENTION OF UROGENITAL INFACTIONS; ANTIMICROBIAL PREPARATIONS, NAMELY, BY-PRODUCTS OF LACTOBACILLUS METABOLISM FOR THE TREATMENT AND PREVENTION OF UROGENITAL INFECTIONS; PHARMACEUTICAL PREPARATIONS CONTAINING LACTOBACILLI OR BY-PRODUCTS THEREOF FOR USE ON URINARY CATHETERS TO PREVENT URINARY TRACT INFACTIONS | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 19, 1995 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 5, 1995 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 16, 1994 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 28, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 24, 1993 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 25, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 27, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 24, 1992 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 1, 1991 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 11, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 25, 1991 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 22, 1991 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 14, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 31, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 26, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 9, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 31, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 13, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |