USPTO serial 73834574
PRIMERO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEVINE, HOWARD B
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PRIMERO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
WILLIAM JAMES KOPACZ
WILLIAM JAMES KOPACZ COBRIN FEINGERTZ GITTES366 MADISON AVENEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | COSMETICS AND PERSONAL CARE ITEMS, NAMELY TOILET WATER, PERFUMES, PRESHAVE AND AFTERSHAVE LOTIONS, PRESHAVE AND AFTERSHAVE CREAMS, FACIAL CREAMS, BODY CREAMS, BODY LOTIONS, FOAMING BATH LOTIONS, TALCUM, PERSONAL DEODORANTS | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 9, 1991 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 9, 1991 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Nov 27, 1991 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 22, 1991 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 8, 1991 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 7, 1990 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 17, 1990 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 13, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 16, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 26, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 6, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 14, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |