USPTO serial 73834804
STARFLEX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 15, 1993
- Examiner
- FICKES, JERI J
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with STARFLEX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Z. PETER SAWICKI
Z PETER SAWICKI KINNEY & LANGESTE 1500 625 FOURTH AVE SMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55415UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 017 | STERILIZABLE MULTI-LAYER MEDICAL PACKAGING SINGLE SHEET FILM SOLD IN ROLLS FOR USE ON THERMOFORMING EQUIPMENT | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 3, 2000 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jun 15, 1993 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 23, 1993 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 19, 1993 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 22, 1992 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 18, 1992 | WRDA | WITHDRAWAL OF REFUSAL DURING APPEAL | — |
| Aug 7, 1992 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 7, 1992 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 17, 1992 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Mar 31, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 31, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 10, 1991 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Sep 4, 1991 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 12, 1990 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 16, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 19, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 19, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |