USPTO serial 73835174
LA PAULINA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- EVANKO, PATRICIA MALESARDI
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LA PAULINA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
CORDOBA - CORDOBA, AR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
HAROLD D. STEINBERG
HAROLD D STEINBERG STEINBERG & RASKIN1140 AVE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK CITY, NY 10036UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | COMMODITIES; MILK PRODUCTS, NAMELY CHEESE | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 17, 1992 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 21, 1992 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jul 21, 1992 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| May 20, 1992 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 24, 1992 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 9, 1991 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 24, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 1, 1991 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Feb 25, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 28, 1990 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 23, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 19, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 21, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |