USPTO serial 73835500
MONTEREY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SANTOMARTINO, MARTHA L
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MONTEREY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Redwood City, CA
Redwood City, CA
REDWOOD CITY, CA
Redwood City, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Terrance A. Meador
TERRANCE A MEADOR BAKER, MAXHAM, JESTER & MEADORSYMPHONY TOWERS, STE 2770750 B STSAN DIEGO, CA 92101Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | DIVING GLOVES | ABANDONED | Jan 26, 1989 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by S - TRON HOLDINGS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by S-TRON HOLDINGS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by TEKNA, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by LASHDELL UNDERWATER PARTNERS
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named MONTEREY
- Prosecution event ABN2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 15, 1995 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 25, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 6, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 23, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 26, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 23, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 7, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 23, 1990 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 22, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 27, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |