USPTO serial 73835553
JACQUES DESSANGE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 1657175Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 17, 1991
- Examiner
- MOSKOWITZ SIDNEY I
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with JACQUES DESSANGE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
75008 PARIS, FR
75008 PARIS, FR
75008 PARIS, FR
75008 PARIS, FR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JAMES W. GIPPLE
JAMES W GIPPLE GIPPLE & HALEP O BOX 40513WASHINGTON, DC 20016UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | MANUALLY OPERATED TOOLS; NAMELY, SCISSORS, CLIPPERS AND RAZORS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by FRANKLIN-HOLDING, S.A.
- Other trademarks owned by FRANKLIN-HOLDING, S.A.
- Other trademarks owned by FRANKLIN-HOLDING, S.A.
- Other trademarks owned by DESSANGE INTERNATIONAL
- Other trademarks in Class 008
- Similar marks named JACQUES DESSANGE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 22, 2016 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jan 7, 2009 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 22, 2001 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Oct 22, 2001 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Aug 8, 2001 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| Apr 15, 1997 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Feb 13, 1997 | RRPR | RESPONSE RECEIVED TO POST REG. ACTION | — |
| Dec 19, 1996 | PR23 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15 | — |
| Nov 18, 1996 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Sep 17, 1991 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 11, 1991 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 11, 1991 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 1, 1991 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 20, 1991 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 19, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 19, 1990 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 5, 1990 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 10, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 26, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |