USPTO serial 73835668
KV
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KREBS, CATHERINE K.
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with KV?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
MISSISSAUGA, ONTARIO L4Y 2H9, CA
MISSISSAUGA, ONTARIO L4Y 2H9, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
PETER R. HAMMOND
PETER R HAMMOND MOSS, BARRIGAR & OYENSTE 1250, MISSISSAUGA EXECUTIVE CTRTWO ROBERT SPECK PKWYMISSISSAUGA, ON L4Z 1H8Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | REMOVABLE METAL COVERS FOR COVERING PORTIONS OF AN ITEM TO BE PAINTED | ABANDONED | — |
| 020 | REMOVABLE NON-METALLIC COVERS FOR COVERING PORTIONS OF AN ITEM TO BE PAINTED | ABANDONED | — |
| 025 | CLOTHING; NAMELY, BODY SUITS MADE OF SOFT, ABSORBENT CLOTH MATERIAL AND INTENDED FOR LEISURE OR BATH WEAR | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 2, 1992 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 16, 1992 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 16, 1992 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 31, 1991 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 27, 1991 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 26, 1991 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 11, 1991 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 5, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 15, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 20, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 5, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 10, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 25, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 21, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |