USPTO serial 73835786
PARAGON REPRODUCTIONS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MOSKOWITZ SIDNEY I
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PARAGON REPRODUCTIONS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DOUGLAS W. SPRINKLE
DOUGLAS W SPRINKLE GIFFORD, GROH, SHERIDAN, ET AL280 N WOODWARD, STE 400BIRMINGHAM, MI 48009UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | AUTOMOTIVE REPLACEMENT PARTS, NAMELY AUTOMOTIVE MIRRORS, AUTOMOTIVE WHEEL TRIM, AUTOMOTIVE HOOD COMPONENTS; NAMELY, BUMPERS AND LATCHES, SHIFT BOOTS, LUGGAGE RACKS, ENGINE PULLEYS, EXHAUST HANGERS, AIR CLEANERS, OIL LINE CANISTERS, EXHAUST MANIFOLDS, CRANKCASE VENT TUBES, CARBURETOR GASKETS, MOLDED CRANKCASE HOSES AND MOLDED RADIATOR HOSES, RADIATOR CAPS, ENGINE TRANSMISSION MOUNTS, WINDSHIELD WIPERS, GRILLS, BUMPERS, CLUTCHES, CHOKES, FUEL LINES, BRAKE LINES, TRANSMISSION LINES, AND CRANKCASE VENT TUBES | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 24, 1992 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 13, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 2, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 18, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 27, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 5, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 20, 1990 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 11, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 16, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 6, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 2, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 28, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |