Drawing for DEPOSITION TECHNOLOGY

USPTO serial 73836040

DEPOSITION TECHNOLOGY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RUBEL, ELLEN A.
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DEPOSITION TECHNOLOGY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

HARRY B. KECK

HARRY B KECK415 LAWYERS BLDGPITTSBURGH, PA 15219UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006DEPOSITION MATERIALS, NAMELY, ELEMENTAL METALS, COMPOSITE ALLOYS AND REFRACTORY METALS, CERAMIC TARGETS, BACKING PLATES MADE PRIMARILY OF METAL FOR USE IN VAPOR DEPOSITION PROCESSES USED IN THE AEROSPACE, ARCHITECTURAL GLASS COATING, MAGNETIC MEDIA, OPTICAL COATING, MICRO ELECTRONIC AND PHOTO VOLTAIC INDUSTRIESABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 18, 1991ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Jan 18, 1991DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 24, 1990CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 2, 1990CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 18, 1990CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 4, 1990CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 16, 1990CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 20, 1990CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 26, 1990CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 10, 1990CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 4, 1989UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance