USPTO serial 73836268
PROXIMA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BELENKER, ESTHER
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PROXIMA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
LES SYSTEMES PROXIMA LTEE/PROXIMA SYSTEMS LIMITED
MONTREAL, QUEBEC H2Z 1B1, CA
Other trademarks owned by LES SYSTEMES PROXIMA LTEE/PROXIMA SYSTEMS LIMITED
LES SYSTEMES PROXIMA LTEE/PROXIMA SYSTEMS LIMITED
MONTREAL, QUEBEC H2Z 1B1, CA
Other trademarks owned by LES SYSTEMES PROXIMA LTEE/PROXIMA SYSTEMS LIMITED
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
GENE S. WINTER
GENE S WINTER ST-ONGE STEWARD JOHNSTON & REENS986 BEDFORD STSTAMFORD, CT 06905UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTERS, COMPUTER HARDWARE, AND COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR USE IN THE FIELD OF THE CABLE TELEVISION SYSTEM INDUSTRY AND BUSINESS MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS | ABANDONED | — |
| 035 | CONSULTING SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF BUSINESS MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS; NAMELY, THE CREATION, DEVELOPMENT AND MARKETING OF MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS AND THE SUPPORT THEREOF | ABANDONED | — |
| 041 | EDUCATIONAL TRAINING SERVICES REGARDING THE USE OF BUSINESS MANAGEMENT INFORMATIION SYSTEMS | ABANDONED | — |
| 042 | SOFTWARE DESIGN SERVICES; CONSULTING SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF COMPUTERIZED INFORMATION MANAGEMENT | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by LES SYSTEMES PROXIMA LTEE/PROXIMA SYSTEMS LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by LES SYSTEMES PROXIMA LTEE/PROXIMA SYSTEMS LIMITED
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named PROXIMA
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 12, 1993 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 8, 1993 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 8, 1993 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 11, 1992 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 28, 1992 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 27, 1992 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 19, 1991 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 17, 1991 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 29, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 2, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 4, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 4, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 1, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 31, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 28, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 26, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 24, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 2, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |