USPTO serial 73836404
Serial No. 73836404
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 21, 1992
- Examiner
- JEFFRIES, STEPHEN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with Serial No. 73836404?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
EDWARD S. WRIGHT
EDWARD S WRIGHT FLEHR, HOHBACH, TEST, ET ALFOUR EMBARCADERO CTR STE 3400SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111-4187UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | CONTAINERS FOR USE IN STORING, HEATING AND SERVING POTATOES FOR DOMESTIC USE | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 25, 1999 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jul 21, 1992 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Nov 18, 1991 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 18, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 12, 1991 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 31, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 1, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 30, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 20, 1990 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Oct 15, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 5, 1990 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 10, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 2, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 29, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |