USPTO serial 73836977
AEA TECHNOLOGY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SHAW, THOMAS V
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with AEA TECHNOLOGY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
WILLIAM R. HINDS
WILLIAM R HINDS727 TWENTY-THIRD ST SARLINGTON, VA 22202UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNICAL RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT; TRANSFERRING TECHNOLOGY AND PROVIDING TECHNICAL AID AND ASSISTANCE IN THE UTILIZATION THEREOF; CONSULTING AND RESEARCH SERVICES IN THE NATURE OF QUALITY ASSURANCE, RELIABILITY AND SAFETY STUDIES; PROOF TESTING SERVICES; CALIBRATION AND METROLOGY SERVICES; SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNICAL CONSULTING SERVICES; PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT OF SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNICAL RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS; COMPUTER CALCULATION AND MATHEMATICAL MODELLING SERVICES; MAINTAINING AND MANAGING COMPUTER DATA BASES; COMPUTER SOFTWARE DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES; TESTING OR ANALYZING THE PROPERTIES, STRUCTUR | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 11, 1994 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 18, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 18, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 24, 1994 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 27, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 17, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 10, 1992 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 12, 1991 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 20, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 20, 1990 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 18, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 8, 1990 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 26, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |