USPTO serial 73837009
HIGH TECH SEPARATIONS TECHNOLOGY NEWS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 1658180Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 24, 1991
- Examiner
- FISHER, HANNAH
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with HIGH TECH SEPARATIONS TECHNOLOGY NEWS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
BUSINESS COMMUNICATIONS CO., INC.
NORWALK, CT
BUSINESS COMMUNICATIONS CO., INC.
NORWALK, CT
BUSINESS COMMUNICATIONS CO., INC.
NORWALK, CT
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | NEWSLETTER DEALING WITH CHEMICAL SEPARATIONS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by BUSINESS COMMUNICATIONS CO., INC.
- Other trademarks owned by BUSINESS COMMUNICATIONS CO., INC.
- Other trademarks owned by BUSINESS COMMUNICATIONS CO., INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Similar marks named HIGH TECH SEPARATIONS TECHNOLOGY NEWS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 20, 2002 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Mar 1, 1997 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Jan 27, 1997 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Jan 27, 1997 | XXXX | POST REGISTRATION ACTION CORRECTION | — |
| Sep 24, 1991 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 2, 1991 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 1, 1991 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 21, 1991 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 26, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 13, 1991 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 8, 1991 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Feb 1, 1991 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 7, 1990 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 19, 1990 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 26, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 20, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 24, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 4, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |