USPTO serial 73837875
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOHN F. MCKENNA
JOHN F MCKENNA NUTTER, MCCLENNEN & FISHONE INTERNATIONAL PLBOSTON, MA 02110UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | EDUCATIONAL SERVICES, NAMELY, THE CONDUCTING OF SEMINARS AND CONFERENCES IN THE FIELD OF DATA PROCESSING, DATA COMMUNICATIONS AND COMPUTER HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE | ABANDONED | May 26, 1989 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 14, 1992 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 14, 1992 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 8, 1991 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 19, 1991 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 18, 1991 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 18, 1990 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 27, 1990 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 27, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 27, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 9, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |