USPTO serial 73838067
CANKWIK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FINE, STEVEN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CANKWIK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
WILLIAM H. NEEDLE, ESQ.
WILLIAM H NEEDLE ESQ NEEDLE & ROSENBERG, PCSTE 1200, THE CANDLER BLDG127 PEACHTREE ST N EATLANTA, CA 30303Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | VENDING MACHINE FOR DISPENSING TENNIS BALLS | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 24, 1994 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 1, 1993 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 17, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 9, 1992 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 27, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 10, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 7, 1991 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 25, 1991 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 6, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 2, 1990 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 23, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 23, 1990 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jan 19, 1990 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |