USPTO serial 73838093
DERMAHAVEN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 1638986Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 26, 1991
- Examiner
- BORSUK, ESTHER
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with DERMAHAVEN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
TORRANCE, CA
SAN JOSE, CA
TEMECULA, CA
TORRANCE, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
REBECCA B. LEDERHOUSE
REBECCA B LEDERHOUSE MCDERMOTT WILL EMERY227 W MONROE ST STE 4400CHICAGO, IL 60606-5096UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | LATEX GLOVES FOR MEDICAL USE | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 1, 1989 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by F.F.F. ENTERPRISES, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by CALIFORNIA BANK OF COMMERCE
- Other trademarks owned by F.F.F. ENTERPRISES, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by F.F.F. ENTERPRISES, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Similar marks named DERMAHAVEN
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 19, 2020 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jan 22, 2016 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Aug 14, 2013 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Dec 24, 2008 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Oct 22, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 1, 2001 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| May 1, 2001 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jan 2, 2001 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| May 13, 1997 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Mar 26, 1997 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Mar 26, 1991 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 1, 1991 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 1, 1990 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 24, 1990 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 9, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 29, 1990 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 30, 1990 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Mar 8, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 11, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 4, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |