USPTO serial 73838421
CLEAN CONCEPT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BORSUK, ESTHER
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CLEAN CONCEPT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
NORTH VANCOUVER, BRITISH COLUMBIA, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ROBERT H. BARRIGAR
ROBERT H BARRIGAR MARGER & JOHNSON, PC650 AMERICAN BANK BLDG621 S W MORRISON STPORTLAND, OR 97205Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | TOILETS; TOILETS INCORPORATING SANITARY TOILET SEAT COVER DISPENSING MECHANISMS; AUTOMATIC TOILET FLUSHING MECHANISMS; MECHANICAL AND ELECTRICAL PARTS AND MECHANISMS FOR TOILETS | ABANDONED | — |
| 016 | TOILET PAPER; TOILET SEAT COVERS | ABANDONED | — |
| 037 | REPAIR AND MAINTENANCE OF TOILETS | ABANDONED | — |
| 042 | DISTRIBUTORSHIP SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF TOILET SUPPLIES | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by CLEAN CONCEPT CANADA INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named CLEAN CONCEPT
- Prosecution event ABN2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 18, 1996 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 7, 1995 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 31, 1995 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 1, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 28, 1994 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 6, 1994 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 21, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 27, 1993 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 16, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 5, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 2, 1992 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 11, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 13, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 16, 1991 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 23, 1991 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 3, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 9, 1990 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 10, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 19, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 22, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 8, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |