Drawing for CREME DE LA TERRE

USPTO serial 73838822

CREME DE LA TERRE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HINES, CARYN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CREME DE LA TERRE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

THADDIUS J. CARVIS

THADDIUS J CARVISST ONGE STEWARD JOHBSTON & REENS986 BEDFORD STSTAMFORD, CT 06905

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003MOISTURIZERS, NIGHT CREAMS, EYE BALMS, BODY LOTIONS, MASQUES, CLEANSERS, TONERS, SOAPS, BATH TOILETRIES, SHAMPOOS, CONDITIONERS, BATH POWDERS AND CREAMS, SUNSCREEN CREAMS, SUN MOISTURIZERS AND TINTED MOISTURIZERSABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 12, 1994EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Dec 16, 1993ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Dec 16, 1993EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Oct 5, 1993EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Feb 2, 1993CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 29, 1992CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 9, 1991CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
May 15, 1990CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Apr 23, 1990CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 7, 1990CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Feb 12, 1990DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 12, 1990DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 19, 1990DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance