USPTO serial 73838833
MAXLINE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 605
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MAXLINE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
TORRANCE, CA
TORRANCE, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | RACKET STRINGING MACHINES | ABANDONED | Jul 1, 1989 |
| 028 | SPORTING ARTICLES - NAMELY, TENNIS RACKETS, BADMINTON RACKETS, RACKETBALL RACKETS, SQUASH RACKETS, TENNIS BALLS, BADMINTON SHUTTLECOCKS, BADMINTON NETS, TENNIS PRESSES, BADMINTON PRESSES, RACKET BAGS, RACKET COVERS, RACKET CARRYING CASES, TENNIS BALL THROWING MACHINES | ABANDONED | Jul 1, 1989 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 27, 1990 | ABN5 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 4, 1990 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 9, 1990 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 6, 1990 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 28, 1990 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 11, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 29, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 17, 1990 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Apr 17, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 23, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 22, 1990 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Mar 8, 1990 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 8, 1990 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Feb 12, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 29, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 18, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |