USPTO serial 73839193
EUROPEAN DOLL ARTISTS COLLECTION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 16, 1991
- Examiner
- COHEN, JEFFREY R.
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with EUROPEAN DOLL ARTISTS COLLECTION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
FRANKLIN CENTER, PA
FRANKLIN CENTER, PA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ARTHUR H. SEIDEL
ARTHUR H SEIDEL SEIDEL, GONDA, LAVORGNA & MONACO, PCSTE 1800 TWO PENN CTR PLZPHILADELPHIA, PA 19102UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | DOLLS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Nov 10, 1989 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 20, 1998 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jul 16, 1991 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Apr 10, 1991 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 10, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 2, 1991 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Jan 31, 1991 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 31, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 13, 1990 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 5, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 1, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 18, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 18, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |