Drawing for NON-ACNEGENIC NON COMEDOGENIC WON'T CLOG PORES

USPTO serial 73839505

NON-ACNEGENIC NON COMEDOGENIC WON'T CLOG PORES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SZOKE, MICHAEL
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NON-ACNEGENIC NON COMEDOGENIC WON'T CLOG PORES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

GARY C. WILKERSON

GARY C WILKERSON MAYBELLINE, INC3030 JACKSON AVEMEMPHIS, TN 38115UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003COSMETICS, NAMELY BLUSH, FACE POWDER AND FACIAL MAKE-UPABANDONEDFeb 14, 1989

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 2, 1992EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jun 5, 1992ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jun 5, 1992EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Sep 24, 1991NAUDNOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - MAILED—
Sep 9, 1991ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Sep 9, 1991CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 15, 1991JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Feb 27, 1991CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 21, 1990CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 31, 1990CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 22, 1990CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 10, 1990DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance