USPTO serial 73839933
ROMANZA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GRAY, CAROLYN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ROMANZA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
90144 PALERMO, IT
90144 PALERMO, IT
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JESS M. COLLEN
JESS M COLLEN SCARBOROUGH STATIONMCGLEW AND TUTTLE, PCSCARBOROUGH, NY 10510-0827UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | MEAT, FISH, POULTRY AND GAME; MEAT EXTRACTS; PRESERVED, DRIED AND COOKED FRUITS AND VEGETABLE; JELLIES, JAMS; EGGS, MILK AND DAIRY PRODUCTS EXCLUDING CHEESE, ICE CREAM, ICE MILK AND FROZEN YOGURT; FRUIT PRESERVES, PICKLES | ABANDONED | — |
| 030 | COFFEE, TEA, COCOA, SUGAR, RICE, TAPIOCA, SAGO, COFFEE SUBSTITUTES; FLOUR AND PROCESSED CEREALS; BREADS, SICILIAN NOUGATS, PASTRY, CANDY, AND FLAVORED ICES; HONEY, TREACLE; YEAST; BAKING-POWDER; SALT, MUSTARD, PEPPER, VINEGAR, SAUCES EXCLUDING CRANBERRY SAUCE AND APPLESAUCE; SPICES; ICE | ABANDONED | — |
| 031 | AGRICULTURAL, HORTICULTURAL AND FORESTRY PRODUCTS; NAMELY, LIVE FOLIAGE, GRAFTS, BULBS, TUBERS, RHIZOMES; UNPROCESSED GRAINS FOR EATING, AGRICULTURAL GRAINS FOR PLANTING; LIVING ANIMALS; FRESH FRUITS AND VEGETABLES; NAMELY, ORANGES, LEMONS, MANDARINES, GRAPES, TOMATOES, POTATOES, CARROTS, FENNELS, ONIONS, CAULIFLOWER, CUCUMBERS, CANTALOUPE, MELON, WATERMELON, VEGETABLES FOR SALADS, ARTICHOKES, PEPPERS, COURGETTES, TURNIP-ROOTED CABBAGE (KOHLRABI), CELERY, POMEGRANATE, PEACHES, PLUMS, FIGS, INDIAN FIGS, OLIVES, CHAMPIGNONS AND WILD MUSHROOMS, HAZEL-NUTS, ALMONDS, PISTACHIOS AND THEIR BY-PRODUCTS; LIVE PLANTS AND FLOWERS; ANIMAL FEED; MALT FOR BREWING AND DISTILLING | ABANDONED | — |
| 032 | BEER; MINERAL, AERATED AND SPRING WATERS, SOFT DRINKS, FRUIT JUICES AND FRUIT DRINKS, NON-ALCOHOLIC COCKTAIL MIXES, SYRUPS, CONCENTRATES USED IN THE PREPARATION OF SOFT DRINKS | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SICILTRADING S.P.A.
- Other trademarks owned by SICILTRADING S.P.A.
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 031
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Similar marks named ROMANZA
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 15, 1994 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 29, 1994 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Oct 14, 1994 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 26, 1994 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 21, 1994 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 28, 1993 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 26, 1993 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 9, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 3, 1993 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 9, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 19, 1992 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 16, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 24, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 2, 1992 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Dec 23, 1991 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 5, 1991 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 4, 1991 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 12, 1991 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Mar 5, 1991 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 22, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 1, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 1, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 11, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |