Drawing for ROMANZA

USPTO serial 73839933

ROMANZA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GRAY, CAROLYN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with ROMANZA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JESS M. COLLEN

JESS M COLLEN SCARBOROUGH STATIONMCGLEW AND TUTTLE, PCSCARBOROUGH, NY 10510-0827UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029MEAT, FISH, POULTRY AND GAME; MEAT EXTRACTS; PRESERVED, DRIED AND COOKED FRUITS AND VEGETABLE; JELLIES, JAMS; EGGS, MILK AND DAIRY PRODUCTS EXCLUDING CHEESE, ICE CREAM, ICE MILK AND FROZEN YOGURT; FRUIT PRESERVES, PICKLESABANDONED—
030COFFEE, TEA, COCOA, SUGAR, RICE, TAPIOCA, SAGO, COFFEE SUBSTITUTES; FLOUR AND PROCESSED CEREALS; BREADS, SICILIAN NOUGATS, PASTRY, CANDY, AND FLAVORED ICES; HONEY, TREACLE; YEAST; BAKING-POWDER; SALT, MUSTARD, PEPPER, VINEGAR, SAUCES EXCLUDING CRANBERRY SAUCE AND APPLESAUCE; SPICES; ICEABANDONED—
031AGRICULTURAL, HORTICULTURAL AND FORESTRY PRODUCTS; NAMELY, LIVE FOLIAGE, GRAFTS, BULBS, TUBERS, RHIZOMES; UNPROCESSED GRAINS FOR EATING, AGRICULTURAL GRAINS FOR PLANTING; LIVING ANIMALS; FRESH FRUITS AND VEGETABLES; NAMELY, ORANGES, LEMONS, MANDARINES, GRAPES, TOMATOES, POTATOES, CARROTS, FENNELS, ONIONS, CAULIFLOWER, CUCUMBERS, CANTALOUPE, MELON, WATERMELON, VEGETABLES FOR SALADS, ARTICHOKES, PEPPERS, COURGETTES, TURNIP-ROOTED CABBAGE (KOHLRABI), CELERY, POMEGRANATE, PEACHES, PLUMS, FIGS, INDIAN FIGS, OLIVES, CHAMPIGNONS AND WILD MUSHROOMS, HAZEL-NUTS, ALMONDS, PISTACHIOS AND THEIR BY-PRODUCTS; LIVE PLANTS AND FLOWERS; ANIMAL FEED; MALT FOR BREWING AND DISTILLINGABANDONED—
032BEER; MINERAL, AERATED AND SPRING WATERS, SOFT DRINKS, FRUIT JUICES AND FRUIT DRINKS, NON-ALCOHOLIC COCKTAIL MIXES, SYRUPS, CONCENTRATES USED IN THE PREPARATION OF SOFT DRINKSABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 15, 1994OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Oct 29, 1994ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Oct 14, 1994OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Apr 26, 1994OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Jan 21, 1994ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Dec 28, 1993PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 26, 1993NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 9, 1993CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 3, 1993CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 9, 1993CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 19, 1992CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 16, 1992CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 24, 1992CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 2, 1992ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Dec 23, 1991CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 5, 1991JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Oct 4, 1991EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Aug 12, 1991CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Mar 5, 1991CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 22, 1990DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 1, 1990CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 1, 1990CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 11, 1990DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance