USPTO serial 73839942
ORACLIM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2441696Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 10, 2001
- Examiner
- BILLINGS, JESSIE W
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with ORACLIM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Yavne, IL
YAVNE, IL
Yavne, IL
Yavne, IL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DONALD M. SANDLER
GARY M NATH NATH & ASSOCIATES PLLC112 S W STALEXANDRIA, VA 22314UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | ATMOSPHERIC MEASUREMENT SYSTEMS COMPRISING COMPUTER SOFTWARE AND MATHEMATICAL MODELS IN THE FORM OF A DATABASE, FOR USE IN WEATHER FORECASTING AND AIR POLLUTION PREDICTION AND MEASUREMENTS, AND PARTS THEREFORE | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ORMAT INDUSTRIES LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by ORMAT TURBINES (1965) LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by ORMAT INDUSTRIES LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by ORMAT INDUSTRIES LTD.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named ORACLIM
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 12, 2008 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Nov 20, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 30, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 10, 2001 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 16, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 15, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 30, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 26, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 14, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 13, 2000 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 29, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 13, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 14, 1999 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 13, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 22, 1998 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 11, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 20, 1998 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 8, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 21, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 20, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 29, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 2, 1996 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 8, 1996 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 17, 1995 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 8, 1994 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 31, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 1, 1993 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 28, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 4, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 4, 1992 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 4, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 17, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 17, 1991 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 31, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 12, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 12, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 9, 1990 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |