Drawing for PETRO STOPPING CENTERS

USPTO serial 73839952

PETRO STOPPING CENTERS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
STOIDES, KATHERINE
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PETRO STOPPING CENTERS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

CAROL L. B. MATTHEWS

CAROL L B MATTHEWS MASON, FENWICK & LAWRENCESTE 1000, 1225 EYE ST N WWASHINGTON, DC 20005UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
012AIR, OIL AND FUEL FILTERS FOR LAND VEHICLESABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 19, 1992EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Mar 6, 1992ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Mar 5, 1992EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Dec 27, 1991CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Aug 9, 1991EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Dec 20, 1990DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Nov 21, 1990DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Nov 21, 1990DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Nov 12, 1990CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 25, 1990CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 15, 1990CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 6, 1990CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 10, 1990DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance