USPTO serial 73840921
WEST COAST
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 2, 1993
- Examiner
- RUPP, TERRY
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with WEST COAST?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
LES BOUTIQUES CINQ SUR CINQ INC.
Montreal, Quebec, CA
LES BOUTIQUES CINQ SUR CINQ INC.
Montreal, Quebec, CA
WEST COAST BOUTIQUES INCORPOREES
BOUCHERVILLE, PROVINCE OF QUEBEC, CA
LES BOUTIQUES CINQ SUR CINQ INC.
Montreal, Quebec, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
THOMAS J MOORE
STEPHEN B SALAI HARTER, SECREST & EMERY1600 BAUSCH & LOMB PLROCHESTER, NY 14604-2711UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | retail sale of men's wearing apparel and accessories therefor, through stores devoted exclusively to sale of such goods | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by LES BOUTIQUES CINQ SUR CINQ INC.
- Other trademarks owned by LES BOUTIQUES CINQ SUR CINQ INC.
- Other trademarks owned by WEST COAST BOUTIQUES INCORPOREES
- Other trademarks owned by LES BOUTIQUES CINQ SUR CINQ INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named WEST COAST
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 19, 2016 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Oct 16, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 5, 2004 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| May 5, 2004 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Mar 9, 2004 | PR89 | RESPONSE RECEIVED TO POST REG. ACTION - SEC. 8 & 9 | — |
| Feb 6, 2004 | PR89 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 9 | — |
| Sep 2, 2003 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| Sep 2, 2003 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 26, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 9, 1999 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Mar 2, 1999 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Mar 2, 1993 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 8, 1992 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 6, 1992 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 27, 1992 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 5, 1992 | EXPR | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL REVERSED | — |
| May 20, 1992 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 30, 1992 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 27, 1991 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Oct 16, 1991 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 14, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 4, 1991 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 7, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 5, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 11, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |