USPTO serial 74000299
FILGIF
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BRUCE, MARY FRANCES
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FILGIF?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
S-260 50 BILLESHOLM, SE
S-260 50 BILLESHOLM, SE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
NEIL F. GREENBLUM
JORDAN S WEINSTEIN SANDLER, GREENBLUM & BERSTEIN2920 S GLEBE RDARLINGTON, VA 22206UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | EAR SAFETY PROTECTORS TO PROTECT EARS FROM EXCESS NOISE AND INJURY, AND PARTS THEREFOR; AUTOMATIC DISPENSERS FOR SUCH EAR SAFETY PROTECTORS, AND PARTS THEREFOR; FACE PROTECTORS; NAMELY, FACE SHIELDS, SCREENS, MASKS AND VISORS; EYE PROTECTORS; NAMELY, GOGGLES, EYE-MASKS, EYE-SHIELDS AND VISORS; BREATHING AND RESPIRATORY SAFETY MASKS, DISPENSERS FOR SUCH MASKS; HEAD PROTECTIVE DEVICES; NAMELY, SAFETY HELMETS, HOODS AND CAPS WITH OR WITHOUT MEANS FOR PROTECTING THE FACE, EYES, EARS AND NECK | ABANDONED | — |
| 010 | EAR SAFETY PROTECTORS TO PROTECT EARS FROM EXCESS NOISE FOR MEDICAL AND PROPHYLACTIC PURPOSES | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 11, 1992 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 23, 1992 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 26, 1991 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 10, 1991 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 4, 1991 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 3, 1991 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 18, 1991 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 16, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 25, 1990 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Aug 22, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 22, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 5, 1990 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 26, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |