USPTO serial 74000338
R & D PORTFOLIO ANALYST
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HINES PATRICK
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with R & D PORTFOLIO ANALYST?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
MENLO PARK, CA
MENLO PARK, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ALYS HAY
ALYS HAY WARE & FREIDENRICH400 HAMILTON AVEPALO ALTO, CA 94301-1809UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER PROGRAMS FOR INTERACTIVE DECISION SUPPORT | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 14, 1994 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Mar 9, 1994 | PILM | PETITION INQUIRY LETTER ISSUED | — |
| Feb 18, 1994 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Feb 2, 1994 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Jan 25, 1994 | PILM | PETITION INQUIRY LETTER ISSUED | — |
| Aug 15, 1993 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 5, 1993 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 5, 1993 | LEXT | LATE FILED EXTENSION REQUEST | — |
| Jan 13, 1993 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 15, 1992 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 4, 1992 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 19, 1992 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 24, 1992 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 17, 1991 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 20, 1990 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 22, 1990 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 21, 1990 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 19, 1990 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 17, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 23, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |