USPTO serial 74000386
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
BRANTFORD, ONTARIO, N3T 5M3, CA
BRANTFORD, ONTARIO, N3T 5M3, CA
BRANTFORD, ONTARIO, N3T 5M3, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MARY-ELIZABETH BUCKLES
MUGS CANADA INC196 DALHOUSIEBRANTFORD, ON N3T 5M3CANADA| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | DOUGHNUTS, MUFFINS, PASTRIES, PIES, CAKES, BRIOCHE, SANDWICHES, COFFEE, TEA, AND HOT CHOCOLATE FOR CONSUMPTION ON OR OFF THE PREMISES | SECTION 18 - CANCELLED | Jul 11, 1992 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 26, 1998 | C18. | CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL | — |
| Jul 24, 1998 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 9, 1998 | CANG | CANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 12, 1997 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 1, 1996 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Jan 19, 1996 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Apr 19, 1995 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Jan 12, 1993 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 18, 1992 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 3, 1992 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 20, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 20, 1992 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 20, 1992 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 29, 1992 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 27, 1992 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 29, 1992 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 22, 1991 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 4, 1991 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 2, 1991 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 8, 1991 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 7, 1990 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 17, 1990 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 24, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 27, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 17, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |