Drawing for LA PAZ

USPTO serial 74000550

LA PAZ

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
GRAY, CAROLYN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LA PAZ?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

CATHERINE J. TOBIN

CATHERINE J HOLLAND KNOBBE, MARTENS, OLSON & BEAR LLP2040 MAIN ST 14TH FLIRVINE, CA 92614UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
032BEERABANDONED
033rum and vodkaABANDONED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 2, 2002TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Apr 14, 1994ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 7, 1993EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED
Oct 12, 1993EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED
Jun 29, 1993EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED
Apr 13, 1993EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED
Nov 2, 1992EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Oct 13, 1992EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
Aug 24, 1992DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE
Jun 10, 1992DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED
May 5, 1992EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Apr 13, 1992EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Mar 9, 1992EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Jan 31, 1992REINREINSTATED
Oct 14, 1991ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 13, 1991EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Apr 16, 1991NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 22, 1991PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 22, 1990NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Jun 21, 1990CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jun 14, 1990CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED
Apr 26, 1990CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 29, 1990CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 9, 1990CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 29, 1990DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jan 17, 1990DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance