USPTO serial 74000629
CAFE CONTINENTAL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- EVANKO, PATRICIA MALESARDI
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CAFE CONTINENTAL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MARK I. FELDMAN
MARK I FELDMAN RUDNICK & WOLFE203 N LASALLE STCHICAGO, IL 60601UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | INGREDIENTS FOR COFFEE; NAMELY, ARTIFICIAL SWEETENERS OR SYNTHETIC SWEETENERS COMPRISED OF NATURAL INGREDIENTS | ABANDONED | — |
| 029 | INGREDIENTS FOR COFFEE; NAMELY, FLAVORED DAIRY AND OR NON-DAIRY CREAMERS | ABANDONED | — |
| 030 | INGREDIENTS FOR COFFEE; NAMELY, NATURAL SWEETENERS | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by DEARFIELD FARMS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by DEARFIELD FARMS, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named CAFE CONTINENTAL
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 23, 1992 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 23, 1992 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 28, 1992 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 14, 1992 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 3, 1991 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 2, 1991 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 13, 1991 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 6, 1991 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 19, 1991 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Mar 4, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 12, 1990 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 8, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 6, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 22, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |