Drawing for Serial No. 74000964

USPTO serial 74000964

Serial No. 74000964

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KRISP, JENNIFER MARIE
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with Serial No. 74000964?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JOHN M. ROMMEL

JOHN M ROMMEL KENYON & KENYON, STE 6001025 CONNECTICUT AVE N WWASHINGTON, DC 20036UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
021SMALL DOMESTIC UTENSILS, NAMELY, PORTABLE HOUSEHOLD CONTAINERS, CONTAINERS FOR FOODS, PAILS, PANS, BOWLS, JUGS, DISHES, DRINKING GLASSES, CROCKERY, SALT POTS, PEPPER POTS, SERVING TRAYS, HOLDING FOR MENU CARDS, AND NAPKIN HOLDERS AND RINGS; HAIR COMBS; AND COSMETIC BRUSHES AND HAIR BRUSHESABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 1, 1992ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Oct 31, 1991CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Aug 22, 1991CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 26, 1991CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
May 1, 1990CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Mar 30, 1990CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 15, 1990CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 24, 1990DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 22, 1990DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance