USPTO serial 74001138
SEAFOOD-LOVER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- APPLEWHITE, FRANCINE L
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SEAFOOD-LOVER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
THOMAS P. LINIAK
THOMAS P LINIAK SHLESINGER & MYERS10220 RIVER RD STE 200POTOMAC, MD 20854UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | SAUCES EXCLUDING CRANBERRY AND APPLESAUCE; SPICES; BREADING FOR SEAFOOD; SEAFOOD SANDWICHES; AND CONDIMENTS, NAMELY KETCHUP, MUSTARD AND RELISHES | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 14, 1992 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 14, 1992 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 10, 1991 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 6, 1991 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 18, 1990 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 16, 1990 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 26, 1990 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 17, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 15, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 2, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 29, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |