USPTO serial 74001139
UNFAT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 1829914Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 5, 1994
- Examiner
- LAWRENCE, ANDREW D
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with UNFAT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
College Park, MD
BRENTWOOD, MD
BRENTWOOD, MD
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joseph W. Berenato, III
Joseph W. Berenato, III Berenato & White, LLC6550 ROCK SPRING DRIVESUITE 240BETHESDA, MD 20817Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | LOW-CALORIE AND/OR LOW OR NO-FAT DAIRY PRODUCTS, EXCLUDING ICE CREAM, ICE MILK AND FROZEN YOGURT | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 28, 1993 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 19, 2016 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jun 28, 2010 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jun 28, 2010 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 28, 2010 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 28, 2010 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 29, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 6, 2006 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 11, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 3, 2003 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Dec 3, 2003 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Sep 11, 2003 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 11, 2000 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Oct 21, 1999 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Apr 5, 1994 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 7, 1994 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 7, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 20, 1993 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 28, 1993 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 10, 1993 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 30, 1993 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Sep 16, 1992 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 1, 1992 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Apr 30, 1992 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 15, 1992 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 4, 1991 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 21, 1991 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 4, 1991 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 28, 1991 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 30, 1990 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 7, 1990 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 11, 1990 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 10, 1990 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 7, 1990 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 9, 1990 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 7, 1990 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 17, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 5, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 31, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |