USPTO serial 74001180
EMERALD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 607
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SZOKE, MICHAEL
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with EMERALD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
STEVEN W. TAN
STEVEN W TAN THE SHERMAN-WILLIAMS COMPANY101 PROSPECT AVE NW1100 MIDLAND BLDG LEGAL DEPTCLEVELAND, OH 44115-1075Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | SANDPAPER FOR USE IN THE AUTOMOTIVE REFINISH INDUSTRY | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 11, 1993 | IUFF | USE AFFIDAVIT FAILED FORMALITIES | — |
| Mar 23, 1993 | ABN7 | ABANDONMENT - DEFECTIVE USE STATEMENT | — |
| Mar 22, 1993 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 22, 1992 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 30, 1992 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 29, 1992 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 12, 1992 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 13, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 4, 1991 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 6, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 16, 1990 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 2, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 2, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |