USPTO serial 74001192
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DAVID WEILD, III
DAVID WEILD III PENNIE & EDMONDS1155 AVE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10036-2711UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | PRESERVED, CANNED AND TINNED FISH, SHELLFISH, POULTRY, MEATS, FRUITS AND VEGETABLES; FISH, SHELLFISH, POULTRY, MEAT AND VEGETABLE SPREADS, PRESERVES AND PASTES, NAMELY - PROCESSED MEAT AND FISH SPREADABLES, JELLIES (FOR FOOD), NAMELY - MEAT JELLIES AND FRUIT JELLIES, PRE-COOKED MEALS CONSISTING PRIMARILY OF FISH, MEAT OR POULTRY; PRESERVED, DRIED, FROZEN AND COOKED FISH,M SHELLFISH, POULTRY, MEATS, PROCESSED, CANNED, BOTTLED, FROZEN OR PRESERVED FRUITS AND VEGETABLES; JAMS, PICKLES | ABANDONED | — |
| 032 | NON-ALCOHOLIC DRINKS, NAMELY - SOFT DRINKS AND MINERAL WATERS, FRUIT JUICES, FRUIT NECTARS AND FRUIT DRINKS | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 27, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 3, 1992 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 6, 1991 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 1, 1991 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 21, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 19, 1991 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 13, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 13, 1990 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 13, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 9, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 25, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |