USPTO serial 74001216
KING OF KINGS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BONNET, ODETTE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with KING OF KINGS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
LOS ANGELES, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LORI N. BOATRIGHT
LORI N BOATRIGHT BLAKELY SOKOLOFF TAYLOR & ZAFMAN12400 WILSHIRE BLVD SEVENTH FLLOS ANGELES, CA 90025UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | ATHLETIC WEARING APPAREL, NAMELY, T-SHIRTS, SWEATSHIRTS, SHORTS, SWEATPANTS AND FOOTWEAR | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 31, 1998 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 31, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 9, 1997 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 22, 1996 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 29, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 8, 1996 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 14, 1995 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 3, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 30, 1994 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 23, 1994 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 8, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 9, 1993 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 11, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 12, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 6, 1992 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 26, 1991 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 18, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 16, 1991 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 8, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 18, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 16, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |