Drawing for INTERCEPTOR

USPTO serial 74001452

INTERCEPTOR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MARSH, SHARON
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with INTERCEPTOR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

BRUCE E. DICK

BRUCE E DICK PERKINS COIE411 - 108TH AVE NE STE 1800BELLEVUE, WA 98004UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009COMPUTER HARDWARE, COMPONENTS AND SPARE PARTS AND COMPUTER PROGRAMS FOR APPLICATION WHICH PROVIDES ELECTRONIC AUDIO ANNOUNCEMENTS TO TELEPHONE CALLERS INFORMING CALLERS OF CHANGES AND POTENTIALLY REDIRECTING CALLS, ANY OF WHICH COMPONENTS IS SOLD AS A UNIT WITH INSTRUCTIONAL MANUALS FOR THE FOREGOINGABANDONEDJun 30, 1986

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 14, 1991ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Mar 14, 1991DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 13, 1991DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 1, 1991CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 27, 1990CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 8, 1990ZZZZALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Aug 13, 1990CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 13, 1990UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 8, 1990CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 27, 1990DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance