USPTO serial 74001504
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Noelle T. Valentine
Noelle T. Valentine ALSTON & BIRD LLP101 South Tryon Street, Suite 4000Charlotte, NC 28280-4000UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | [ body soaps, laundry soap, fabric softeners, automatic dishw asher detergents, ammonia, all-purpose cleaners, bathroom cleaning preparations, kitchen cleaning preparations, and window cleaning preparations ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 31, 1995 |
| 016 | [ paper baby products, namely, disposable diapers ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 31, 1995 |
| 021 | cleaning accessories, namely, gloves | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 31, 1995 |
| 029 | snack foods, namely, potato chips, pork rinds; breakfast foods, namely, ham, eggs, [ frozen fruits ], frozen vegetables, potatoes, [ processed beans ]; frozen meals consisting primarily of meat, fish, poultry or vegetables; fish and vegetable oil; cheese foods; [ spreads, namely, vegetable-based spreads ]; dairy products, namely, milk, butter, cheese, egg nog, [ egg substitute ] and yogurt | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 31, 1995 |
| 030 | staple foods, namely, [ processed grains; flour and ] bread; breakfast foods, namely, [ breakfast cereals, grits, ] waffles and pastries; snack foods, namely, corn chips, [ corn curls ], taco chips, tortilla chips, [ puffed corn snacks ], cheese flavored puffed corn snacks, [ popped popcorn and marshmallows ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 31, 1995 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 27, 2020 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Nov 4, 2016 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2013 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Oct 23, 2007 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Oct 23, 2007 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Oct 19, 2007 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 12, 2007 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| Oct 12, 2007 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 1, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 3, 2003 | C15P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| May 15, 2003 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| May 15, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 4, 1997 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 14, 1997 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| May 23, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 9, 1997 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 15, 1997 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 11, 1996 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 18, 1996 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jun 12, 1996 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 6, 1996 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Oct 4, 1995 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 14, 1995 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 17, 1995 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 29, 1995 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 25, 1994 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 31, 1994 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 26, 1994 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 23, 1993 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 2, 1993 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 16, 1993 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 8, 1992 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 6, 1992 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 1, 1992 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 25, 1992 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 18, 1992 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 6, 1992 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 1, 1992 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 6, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 6, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 29, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 2, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 16, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 14, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 6, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |