USPTO serial 74001517
BIOSPHERE 2
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 30, 1996
- Examiner
- TINGLEY, JOHN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with BIOSPHERE 2?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Oracle, AZ
ORACLE, AZ
ORACLE, AZ
Oracle, AZ
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
RICHARD D. SEIBEL
RICHARD D SEIBEL CHRISTIE PARKER & HALEP O BOX 7068PASADENA, CA 91109-7068UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | prerecorded video tapes for home viewing | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by DECISIONS INVESTMENTS CORP.
- Other trademarks owned by SPACE BIOSPHERES VENTURE
- Other trademarks owned by SPACE BIOSPHERES VENTURE
- Other trademarks owned by DECISIONS INVESTMENTS CORP.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named BIOSPHERE 2
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 1, 2003 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Feb 14, 1997 | PINT | REPRINTING REGISTRATION CERTIFICATE | — |
| Jul 10, 1996 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Apr 30, 1996 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 3, 1996 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 23, 1995 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 27, 1995 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 19, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 16, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 4, 1995 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 16, 1994 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 3, 1994 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Mar 28, 1994 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 3, 1994 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Sep 15, 1993 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 30, 1993 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 24, 1993 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 1, 1993 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 21, 1992 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 4, 1992 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 4, 1992 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 12, 1991 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 11, 1991 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 17, 1991 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 10, 1991 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 5, 1991 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 1, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 1, 1991 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 26, 1990 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 2, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 16, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |