USPTO serial 74001789
SHEFFIELD SCHAUDT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 26, 1993
- Examiner
- COLE RICHARD G
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SHEFFIELD SCHAUDT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
7000 STUTTGART 60, DE
SHEFFIELD SCHAUDT GRINDING SYSTEMS INCORPORATED
DAYTON, OH
Other trademarks owned by SHEFFIELD SCHAUDT GRINDING SYSTEMS INCORPORATED
7000 STUTTGART 60, DE
7000 STUTTGART 60, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOHN L. BEARD
JOHN L BEARD GODFREY & KAHN, SC780 N WATER STMILWAUKEE, WI 53202-3590UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | GRINDING MACHINES AND PARTS THEREOF AND GRINDING WHEEL CLEANING MACHINES AND CRUSH ROLLS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 28, 1990 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SCHAUDT MASCHINENBAU GMBH
- Other trademarks owned by SHEFFIELD SCHAUDT GRINDING SYSTEMS INCORPORATED
- Other trademarks owned by SCHAUDT MASCHINENBAU GMBH
- Other trademarks owned by SCHAUDT MASCHINENBAU GMBH
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Similar marks named SHEFFIELD SCHAUDT
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 2, 1999 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jan 26, 1993 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 3, 1992 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 8, 1992 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 7, 1992 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 2, 1992 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 18, 1992 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 27, 1992 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 23, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 23, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 27, 1991 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 27, 1991 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 15, 1991 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 4, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 29, 1991 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 2, 1991 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 4, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 30, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 6, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 31, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 24, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |