Drawing for SUPERCOMPUTER SYSTEMS INC

USPTO serial 74002037

SUPERCOMPUTER SYSTEMS INC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GLYNN, GERALD
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SUPERCOMPUTER SYSTEMS INC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

BRAD D. PEDERSEN

BRAD D PEDERSEN DORSEY & WHITNEY2200 FIRST BANK PL EMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009SUPERCOMPUTERS; SECONDARY MEMORY UNITS, DISK DRIVE UNITS FOR USE WITH SUPERCOMPUTERSABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 3, 1991ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Apr 8, 1991ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Nov 7, 1990CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 22, 1990ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 16, 1990PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Aug 21, 1990CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 21, 1990PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Feb 9, 1990CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance