USPTO serial 74002096
LASER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STINE, DAVID
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LASER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
WILLIAM M. BORCHARD
WILLIAM M BORCHARD COWAN, LIEBOWITZ & LATMAN, PC605 THIRD AVENEW YORK, NY 10158UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | METAL SCREWS | ABANDONED | Jan 12, 1990 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 5, 1991 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Sep 30, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 16, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 4, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 19, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 19, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 16, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 13, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 27, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 18, 1990 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 12, 1990 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 21, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 21, 1990 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 2, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 24, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |