USPTO serial 74002152
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
HOUSTON, TX
G.T. GRAPHIC TECHNOLOGY LTD. OF ISRAEL
HERZLIYA, IL
Other trademarks owned by G.T. GRAPHIC TECHNOLOGY LTD. OF ISRAEL
HOUSTON, TX
G.T. GRAPHIC TECHNOLOGY LTD. OF ISRAEL
HERZLIYA, IL
Other trademarks owned by G.T. GRAPHIC TECHNOLOGY LTD. OF ISRAEL
GRANT TENSOR GEOPHYSICAL CORPORATION
HOUSTON, TX
Other trademarks owned by GRANT TENSOR GEOPHYSICAL CORPORATION
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
SARAH T. HARRIS
SARAH T HARRIS VADEN, EICKENROHT, THOMPSON, ET ALONE RIVERWAY, STE 1100HOUSTON, TX 77056-1982UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR INTERACTIVE SEISMIC INTERPRETATION | SECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 14, 1994 | C7.. | CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL | — |
| Nov 22, 1993 | RRPR | RESPONSE RECEIVED TO POST REG. ACTION | — |
| Aug 12, 1993 | PRAM | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 7 | — |
| May 6, 1993 | C7RF | REQUEST FOR SECT 7 TOTAL SURRENDER FILED | — |
| Sep 22, 1992 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 5, 1992 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 5, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 3, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 5, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 1, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 16, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 1, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 24, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 24, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 17, 1991 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 7, 1991 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 1, 1991 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 9, 1990 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 8, 1990 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 4, 1990 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 16, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 1, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 5, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 5, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 5, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |