USPTO serial 74002168
THE CO-OP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 605
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KULICK, LIZBETH B
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with THE CO-OP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
GREGORY M. EDALATPOUR
GREGORY M EDALATPOUR KNOBBE, MARTENS, OLSON & BEARSIXTEENTH FL620 NEWPORT CTR DRNEWPORT BEACH, CA 92660Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | ARRANGING AND PROMOTING THE USE OF AUTOMATIC TELLER MACHINES AND SERVICES | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 30, 1993 | ABN5 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 25, 1992 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 24, 1992 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 31, 1991 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 24, 1991 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Jul 3, 1991 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 1, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 10, 1990 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Aug 13, 1990 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jul 25, 1990 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 6, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 19, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |